Skip to main content
The AccuracyEvaluator uses an LLM judge to compare an agent’s generated output against an expected answer. Each evaluation produces a score from 1 to 10 along with detailed reasoning and constructive critique.

​
How It Works

  1. The agent under test receives a query and produces output.
  2. A separate judge agent evaluates the output against the expected answer and guidelines.
  3. The judge returns a structured EvaluationScore containing a numeric score, reasoning, pass/fail flag, and critique.
  4. If num_iterations > 1, the process repeats and scores are averaged.

​
Parameters

​
Result Structure

AccuracyEvaluationResult contains:
  • average_score — Mean score across all iterations (1–10)
  • evaluation_scores — List of EvaluationScore objects, one per iteration
  • generated_output — The output produced by the entity
  • user_query / expected_output — The original inputs
Each EvaluationScore includes:
  • score — Numeric score (1–10)
  • reasoning — Step-by-step explanation from the judge
  • is_met — Boolean indicating whether core requirements are met
  • critique — Actionable feedback on how to improve

​
Methods

​
Usage Examples

Agent

Evaluate a single agent

Team

Evaluate a multi-agent team

Graph

Evaluate a graph workflow